web analytics
Browse > Home / Libtards, WTF / Why the left loves child rapists and other narcissistic tendencies

| Subcribe via RSS

Why the left loves child rapists and other narcissistic tendencies

September 29th, 2009 Posted in Libtards, WTF

With Roman Polanski finally under arrest and apparently going to be returned to the US to finally face the music, the lefty liberals in Hollywood have been in a tizzy over the whole thing. According to the logic presented by those intellectual giants who have joined the “Free Polanski” petition, Roman Polanski should be released for a number of reasons:

Brett Ratner – “The family has forgiven [Polanski]. The victim has forgiven him. The rest of the world has forgiven him,” said Ratner, who cast Polanski as a French detective in his movie “Rush Hour 3.” “The LA judicial system is corrupt. It’s horrible.”

Whoopi Goldberg “I know it wasn’t rape-rape. It was something else but I don’t believe it was rape-rape. He went to jail and and when they let him out he was like ‘You know what, this guy’s going to give me a hundred years in jail I’m not staying,’ so that’s why he left.”

And there’s a bunch more over at Big Hollywood where Guys like Jeff Wells says such insightful things like

Has Polanski suffered at all for his crime, apart from going to jail for 42 days in 1977? Of course he has. The crime has been haunting his head and heart for 32 years and it has defined the political and geographical limits of his life and career for same amount of time — more than half his adult life. He’s lived as a fugitive, a restricted man, a hider in the shadows — never a good thing for anyone in a spiritual sense.

But in the minds of the haters, Polanski hasn’t begun to suffer enough. They’re determined to lash him to the rack and keep him there. They want Pilgrim justice, flayings, black caps, thumbscrews, howls and clanging metal doors.

Wow, poor Roman, forced to live a life in France making movies, going to parties and living in mansions. What a horrible ‘life in the shadows’ he’s had to live in, while his victim only had to go for 32 years with the memory of being RAPED by this piece of shit. Yes, raped. And I’m sorry we don’t want flaying, thumbscrews or any of that, we just want justice. You know the part about “Do the crime, do the time.” Yeah, that kind of shit.

And what did Polanski have to say about it

“If I had killed somebody, it wouldn’t have had so much appeal to the press, you see? But… f—ing, you see, and the young girls. Judges want to f— young girls. Juries want to f— young girls. Everyone wants to f— young girls!”

Later in the interview, Polanski says he likes Paris, to which he’d fled, because it’s “very grown-up”.

So, now we have evidence from his own mouth that not only is he a rapist, but also it is very likely that he is a child molester. So he moved to Paris so he could continue this behavior, is that it? And yet here are supposed adults who claim to love kids, want everyone to be protected, and say that we should do stuff “For the children” coming out and saying that he shouldn’t do any jail time for his crime. How the hell does this make sense in ANY universe?

All that I keep coming back to is this: The left is so narcissistic that it’s not about the crime he committed to a very young girl because they know nothing about her. She is a faceless figure to them but Polanski, why, he makes MOVIES!!! He’s one of them and they LOVE his work and so because of that, because he made something that they like personally, he gets a pass from them. Since he has the same ideology they do they will forgive him for almost anything.

The left loves his movies and are so in awe of his directing skills that they turn a blind eye to his crimes. They consider it a small price to pay for brilliance. Much like Ted Kennedy, the lefts view is that this one ‘indiscretion’ is being blown out of proportion. It was so long ago, he’s a great man. They have weighed what they consider his contributions to our society against his crime and decided that the so-called good outweighs the evil and so are willing to forget it. And by forgiving him they can show how compassionate they are.

It’s still amazing though how easily the left can ignore facts that they don’t like.

“It wasn’t rape-rape”

I don’t know, I would think that her pleading with him to stop as he groped and then vaginally, and anally, raped a young GIRL would be considered RAPE! I would think that anyone hearing of someone having sex with a thirteen year old girl would be outraged enough that they wouldn’t sit around and say “Well, it wasn’t really rape…” what the hell WOULD you call it?!?!

I often wonder if these same loony lefties would be so forgiving if it was their child that was raped. How kind would they be if they had a thirteen year old girl and she came home having to tell them a horror story like the girl Polanski raped? What would they do? Would they be able to look their daughter in the eye and say “Gee, Honey, he’s made such great movies that we don’t want anything to happen to him so let’s just hush this up, OK?”

Or would they go into a white hot rage and do everything they could to make sure this never happened to another young girl again? I know what I would do.

Our system of justice was created so that all would be able to stand equal in front of the courts. Polanski should go to jail and stay there for the full term of his conviction. If any Joe Schmuck had done what he did and then ran away for 30 years we wouldn’t be hearing the crying from the left about “Oh, he shouldn’t go to jail.” Thankfully our court system works on a different scale that the popularity contest so yes, he should go to jail in spite of the fact that Hollywood wants to change the ending.

But I guess following the laws and not raping people only counts in flyover country.

3 Responses to “Why the left loves child rapists and other narcissistic tendencies”

  1. ailuromaniac Says:

    I bet you just thought the Poor Polanski breastbeaters made you sick.

    http://destroyedbyduplicity.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/least-of-these/


  2. Instinct Says:

    No, but I don’t agree with them. I am not a Christian and the ‘turn the other cheek’ is one reason why but if they want to pray for him that’s fine. It doesn’t hurt me and if it make them feel better, great.

    But to say that he shouldn’t face the music for his crime, that’s a whole different story.


  3. ailuromaniac Says:

    It is not Christian to twist scripture. ‘Turn the other cheek’ was never meant to mean do not protect the weak or give criminals free reign.

    If you want to give them a bible behind bars and pray for their souls, fine. I don’t agree with the tent city concept but it was better than not knowing where these creeps were. Personally, I think we ought to buy out the residents of Pitcairn’s Island and drop them off there. Easy to patrol with a few subs and if they decide they’d rather feed the sharks than live with each other fine.

    The but what if they truly repent crowd get my answer of “if they really repent they would fight release because they would feel desserving of imprisonment”.

    I heard a clip of Roman P rambling about how many years it took for him to realize what he had done to the girl was wrong but how he knew it now. Why is he not beating down the doors of the CA courts begging for the opportunity to serve as much of the term of his sentence as the remainder of his life permits? I believe it is because he still does not accept the responsibility for his actions. He does not really believe he has done wrong or is responsible for it because he did not believe it wrong at the time.


Leave a Reply